TankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-210 days agoAnyone ever used something like this? Is it possible to validate it?hexbear.netimagemessage-square25fedilinkarrow-up144arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up144arrow-down1imageAnyone ever used something like this? Is it possible to validate it?hexbear.netTankieTanuki [he/him]@hexbear.net to technology@hexbear.netEnglish · edit-210 days agomessage-square25fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareKairos@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·edit-210 days agoI think a very recent Nobel prize in mathematics Turing award was awarded to someone who proved its impossible to differentiate between (edit: well-programmed) PRNG and TRNG. Mathematically at least.
minus-squarereaper_cushions [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·10 days agoThere is no Nobel Prize in Mathematics. Might be an Abel or Fields medal recipient, though.
minus-squareFaresh@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·10 days agoIt was actually a turing award for the proof that BPP = P (and probably other stuff around the question of randomness).
minus-squareThermonuclearEgg [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·9 days agoJust checked https://amturing.acm.org/. It seems that BPP = P in general is still an unsolved problem in computer science
I think a very recent
Nobel prize in mathematicsTuring award was awarded to someone who proved its impossible to differentiate between (edit: well-programmed) PRNG and TRNG. Mathematically at least.There is no Nobel Prize in Mathematics. Might be an Abel or Fields medal recipient, though.
It was actually a turing award for the proof that BPP = P (and probably other stuff around the question of randomness).
Big Poop Palls
=
Poop
Just checked https://amturing.acm.org/. It seems that BPP = P in general is still an unsolved problem in computer science
That’s it