• electricprism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    How about a Linux Patch that reports binary blobs wirh no source AS __ Security Vulnerabilities __

    Or are we not allowed to criticize the back doors that hackers gain access to.

    • stuner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      It sounds like the criterion is “is newer microcode available”. So it doesn’t look like a marketing strategy to sell new CPUs.

    • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The article does specify that it would report if the newest version of the firmware for the CPU family is not installed, so it doesn’t seem like this is that particular kind of BS.

  • ouch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    The Linux kernel would maintain a list of the latest Intel microcode versions for each CPU family, which is based on the data from the Intel microcode GitHub repository. In turn this list would need to be kept updated with new Linux kernel releases and as Intel pushes out new CPU microcode files.

    Sounds like that would be outdated for everyone without a rolling distro.

    • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Yeah, methinks this will be one of those alerts pretty much everyone will be like “yeah, yeah, I know” and click to silence those notifications.

    • Atemu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Stable distros can and will backport security fixes. Good ones that is.