captainkangaroo to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 month agoIntel Linux Patch Would Report Outdated CPU Microcode As A Security Vulnerabilitywww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1119arrow-down11
arrow-up1118arrow-down1external-linkIntel Linux Patch Would Report Outdated CPU Microcode As A Security Vulnerabilitywww.phoronix.comcaptainkangaroo to Linux@lemmy.ml · 1 month agomessage-square13fedilink
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down2·1 month agoThe real thing is: can you update the microcode of older CPUs? If not then it’s a marketing strategy.
minus-squareundefined@lemmy.hogru.chlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·edit-21 month agoI mean, it’s still good to know if you’re vulnerable right (for sake of discussion)?
minus-squarestuner@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 month agoIt sounds like the criterion is “is newer microcode available”. So it doesn’t look like a marketing strategy to sell new CPUs.
minus-squareIrritableOcelot@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 month agoThe article does specify that it would report if the newest version of the firmware for the CPU family is not installed, so it doesn’t seem like this is that particular kind of BS.
The real thing is: can you update the microcode of older CPUs? If not then it’s a marketing strategy.
I mean, it’s still good to know if you’re vulnerable right (for sake of discussion)?
It sounds like the criterion is “is newer microcode available”. So it doesn’t look like a marketing strategy to sell new CPUs.
The article does specify that it would report if the newest version of the firmware for the CPU family is not installed, so it doesn’t seem like this is that particular kind of BS.