• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    What galls me about this, even more than fat sheriffs getting fatter by starving people, is the inference that since they’re following the law it’s all totally okay. I have an ideological problem not just with that statement, but the sentiment behind it.

    • Kazumara
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yes! The worst was this quote by Entrekin, hiding behind the law acting as if that’s all that matters:

      “It’s the law. I haven’t done anything wrong,” Entrekin said at the time. “If it’s wrong, somebody needs to change the law. I have asked [state legislators] to change the law and they have not changed it.”

      I’m with you on this one, just yesterday on a different post I said as much: https://discuss.tchncs.de/post/25358559/14482392

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      The part of the article saying they get $2/day to feed prisoners, yet the Sheriff “guarantees they are properly fed” and somehow skims $750,000 out of it

    • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      I believe it was an old wild west bill still on the books that should have been replaced decades ago.

        • Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Legality is temporary and blows in the wind.

          These people deserve to be held accountable for their actions, by an authority (ie Federals) capable of breaking through the shit layer of corruption and stink.