• ghen@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 days ago

        Define problem, because it’s less waste than old solar panels per megawatt. Both of which we just throw away in special places designed specifically for that waste.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Define “less”. By volume? Mass? Ecological impact? If you want to say “per megawatt” then you obviously have numbers, let’s see them.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Uh, that wasn’t me, please pay attention. Either way, you made a claim - a quantitative claim no less - it’s on you to back it up. Don’t pretend that someone else’s behaviour excuses yours.

              Nuclear waste is uncontroversially a serious problem. If you want to convince anybody of anything else you need to be willing to communicate, and this isn’t it.

        • gnygnygny@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          In EU you recycling is included in the price. It is mandatory and must be done in EU.