tchncs
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
produnis to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前

welcome

message-square
41
link
fedilink
594

welcome

produnis to Memes@lemmy.ml · 2 年前
message-square
41
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    2 年前

    Jokes on you. I’m a Machinist and that feature on the drawing has an perpendicularity GD&T callout of ± 1deg. In spec is in spec. Ship it!!!

    • Late2TheParty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      I like this positive attitude!

    • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s 87 degrees

      • empireOfLove@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 年前

        No, no- it’s the design engineer who is clearly wrong.

        • c_jay@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          Nah I blame the mathematicians

    • sharpiemarker@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Full send

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    2 年前

    As long as it’s perfectly 89° it’s fine. That’s acute angle.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s very well drawn too, no overshooting on the edges. Looks good to me.

    • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s 87

    • roon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 年前

      Barely acute 😳

  • TWeaK@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 年前

    Engineers: Eh, close enough.

    • theotherone@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 年前

      shrugs Same order of magnitude

  • omgitsaheadcrab@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    Is it exactly 89°?

    • produnisOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      ·
      2 年前

      No. It’s wrong, too. Have a nice day :)

    • Jay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 年前

      I saw this before and if I remember correctly, it’s more like 87°.

    • RedEye FlightControl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 年前

      No. It measures about 87°.

      • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 年前

        Wtf?! The fact that OP got it wrong is even more disturbing!

        • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 年前

          Wrong on purpose

        • Jay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          OP didn’t make this

  • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 年前

    I didn’t know 1° difference would be this noticeable. I am very disturbed.

    • eatham 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 年前

      It’s noticable cos its 87 degrees not 89.

  • neoney@lemmy.neoney.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 年前

    Guys it’s actually 90° but the photo is taken on an angle.

  • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 年前

    90° isn’t any more perfect than 89°. Unless it was supposed to be 90°.

    So if you post this exact thing but include the right angle indicator, that would make the image work as intended.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 年前

      It’s supposed to be 89° but is actually 87°. So it qualifies as imperfect.

      • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 年前

        Love it (after I confirmed it to be true via the rotate function in the photo editor)

      • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 年前

        Oh shi-

  • imgonnatrythis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 年前

    More concerned about why you wasted all those colors on this image when two was sufficient?

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 年前

    Ahhh, I love it when the 89 degree angles are perfectly 89 degrees.

  • Dale@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 年前

    I’ll see you in hell

  • Spliffman1@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 年前

    deleted by creator

  • CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 年前

    You should have put the little square thing in the corner to indicate a right angle!

  • FellowEarthling@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 年前

    I can’t believe you’ve done this

  • NarendraCzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 年前

    Wish i didn’t see this

    • NarendraCzar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 年前

      Anybody who posts images like this have a special position in hell

  • spacesweedkid27 @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 年前

    It’s still perfect since you can just take 32040 of these (= 89*360, ggt is 1 since 89 is prime) and then you will have a full circle. A real shame it would have been when you would have took an irrational amount of degrees since then this calculation would not be possible. There could only be an approximation that makes it impossible in reality to decide if it is right or not but mathematically speaken it would be impossible.

Memes@lemmy.ml

memes@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !memes@lemmy.ml

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.45K users / day
  • 3.88K users / week
  • 7.22K users / month
  • 16.4K users / 6 months
  • 796 local subscribers
  • 53.8K subscribers
  • 15K Posts
  • 322K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
  • sexy_peach@feddit.de
  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
  • Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml
  • BE: 0.19.15
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org