• XeroxCool@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    28 days ago

    Probably because, ideally, the two halves of the one super-long movie should’ve been produced sequentially. Miles-Spiderman-3 isn’t a fresh movie, #2 was ended mid plot as a part 1. If a part 1 was done correctly, part 2’s story would be relatively set in stone. This news means it isn’t, whoch is a bad sign for hopes of continuity

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      Not to mention they delayed releasing part 1 for years (or at least a year cause of covid). You’d have assumed they’d have taken advantage of that, but it could be a casualty of the writers strike.