Here’s a little physics riddle. It’s really meant as a moment of self-reflection for physics teachers (I invite you to compare what answers you’d give within Relativity Theory).

We’re in the context of Newtonian mechanics.

There are three small bodies. In the inertial coordinate system (t, x, y, z), we know the following about the three bodies (at a given instant of time):

  • The first has mass 3 kg
  • The second has velocity (1, 0, 0) m/s
  • The third has momentum (2, 0, 0) kg⋅m/s

Now consider a new coordinate system (t’, x’, y’, z’) related to the first by the following transformation (a Galileian boost):

t’ = t, x’ = x - u⋅t, y’ = y, z’ = z with u = 1 m/s

Questions:

  • What is the mass of the first body in the new coordinate system?
  • What is the velocity of the second body in the new coordinate system?
  • What is the momentum of the third body in the new coordinate system?

Can you give definite answers to these three questions, and motivate your answers with simple physical principles? Note that by “definite answer” I don’t necessarily mean an answer with a definite numerical value.

  • stravanasu@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Completely agree, which I think is very interesting. In Newtonian mechanics, some scalar and vector quantities such as mass, internal energy, contact forces (stress), heat flux are frame-indifferent. Others, such as velocity and acceleration, are frame-dependent but we do have transformation rules for them. Some quantities – and quite important ones – such as momentum, are in a sort of limbo: they are frame-dependent, but there’s no clear transformation rule for them.

    From the point of view of relativity theory, it’s interesting to note that for this particular case of coordinate transformation – note that it is not a Lorentz boost – we can actually calculate the spatial components of momentum in the new coordinate system, if the reported momentum is expressed as a covariant vector (p_µ). This is because its unknown temporal component (energy) gets multiplied by zero in this transformation. But the text is ambiguous on whether the reported components are covariant or contravariant.