• Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Shaw explained that the act of asset reuse is essential in stopping crunch

    Utter bullshit, you stop crunch with realistic timeframes and competent planning/project management.

    Asset reuse could be part of that sure, but making out like it’s essential is a geometric fractal of red flags holding other, smaller, red flags.

      • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Do you think you end up with a more realistic development timeline by remaking things you’ve already made? Your comment can end up downvoted for calling one of the most common industry practices, for very practical reasons, “cutting corners”.

      • Ledivin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Because it’s fucking inane. Yes, it’s only one part of the problem - nothing was ever stated otherwise, he’s simply speaking on the topic at hand.

        Do you also say “no, ALL lives matter?”

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          17 hours ago

          “Essential” implies more than just a small part, but if you want to claim otherwise you are free to do so.

          Do you also say “no, ALL lives matter?”

          Because project management is comparable to civil rights? That’s some weak sauce whattaboutism.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Downvotes with no actual reasoning behind them?

        I am shocked, shocked i tell you.