257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 10 months agoWhat are your programming hot takes?message-squaremessage-square885fedilinkarrow-up1348arrow-down114
arrow-up1334arrow-down1message-squareWhat are your programming hot takes?257m@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.dev · 10 months agomessage-square885fedilink
minus-squareDigital Mark@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoTerrible projects are terrible because of the developers, not because of the language. I find dynamic projects easier to refactor and fix, just write some tests and if it’s green bar before and after, you’re fine.
minus-squareT (they/she)@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·10 months ago…did you ever work with business/product people?
minus-squareDigital Mark@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoAll my career. They can’t program, they have no valid opinion about programming, as long as we finish the user stories. Which is several times faster in a nice dynamic language than a bondage language.
Terrible projects are terrible because of the developers, not because of the language.
I find dynamic projects easier to refactor and fix, just write some tests and if it’s green bar before and after, you’re fine.
…did you ever work with business/product people?
All my career. They can’t program, they have no valid opinion about programming, as long as we finish the user stories. Which is several times faster in a nice dynamic language than a bondage language.