You can look up the risk for US addresses here

  • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    They’re comparing actual exposure to estimated risk at that exposure. So no, we’re not doing nearly enough to limit exposure, which is the whole point.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      They’re comparing actual exposure to estimated risk at that exposure.

      Where? They refer to a 2003 study https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14600094/ with the conclusion:

      Conclusions: Exposure to formaldehyde may cause leukemia, particularly myeloid leukemia, in humans. However,results from other investigations are mixed,

      Apparently they were unable to find further studies to support their claim where they state as FACT that causes myeloid!!

      It is a chemical so pervasive that a new analysis by ProPublica found it exposes everyone to elevated risks of developing cancer no matter where they live.

      This is not true. Except counting naturally occurring formaldehyde, which indeed is everywhere, but not enough to make you sick, because we evolved in it!

      perhaps most worrisome, it often poses the greatest risk in the one place people feel safest: inside their homes.

      This may be somewhat true, which is why you must always let the air out of your home twice a day. But that’s not because of formaldehyde alone. Also CO2 can build up, and radon can sieve in from below too. That formaldehyde is partially naturally occurring, and in homes come mostly from wood. If you have a lot of chipped wood, it has more because the glue used to make chipped wood contain it too. But this is regulated so products meet safety standards.

      We had the debate here in Denmark in the 70’s, claiming this 40 year old problem is suddenly an emergency that kill more people than any other pollutant is dishonest and sensationalist.

      Outdoor air is often suffused with formaldehyde gas from cars, smoke, factories, and oil and gas extraction, sometimes at worrying levels

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formaldehyde

      Processes in the upper atmosphere contribute more than 80% of the total formaldehyde in the environment.

      Conveniently this scare piece does not mention at all, that most formaldehyde is naturally occurring!!!

      Also from the Wiki:

      Formaldehyde and its adducts are ubiquitous (all over) in nature. Food may contain formaldehyde at levels 1–100 mg/kg

      Which the article also completely omit to mention, it is more misleading than informative.

      Again: https://www.epa.gov/formaldehyde/laws-and-**regulations-concerning-formaldehyde**

      Categories which formaldehyde is regulated under the NESHAP:
      Plywood and composite wood products
      Vehicle emissions
      Wet formed fiber glass mat production
      Mineral wool production
      Wool fiberglass manufacturing
      Manufacture of amino/phenolic resins
      Wood furniture manufacturing operations
      Rubber tire manufacturing
      Natural gas transmission and storage facilities
      Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing industry
      Organic liquid distribution operations
      Taconite iron ore processing
      Emissions for polyvinyl chloride and copolymers production

      Notice that wood is included in those regulations.

      Edit PS:
      OK apparently some people think they know better, than someone who has followed this issue for 40 years.
      Despite I’m pointing out decidedly dishonest reporting, including misrepresenting results of studies!!
      However I slipped up a bit myself, and have made a couple edits for better accuracy.

      • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        We can’t take the risk to zero — but we can reduce it pretty sharply. And that would be a big deal.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Absolutely, there may be areas where better regulation is required, but there is no reason to make a misleading scare piece full of lies to bring that point.

      • qqq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This may be true, which is why you must always let the air out of your home twice a day. Still that formaldehyde is naturally occurring, and in homes come mostly from wood. So it’s not an “industry” hazard, and it’s not an artificially produced chemical.

        It looks like it comes specifically from composite wood and the glues used in making those composites, not solid wood. That seems to be supported by some quick internet searching. Regular wood appears to release formaldehyde at high temperatures.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It is true that chipboard release more formaldehyde because of the glue, which is the reason it’s regulated.