Huffman has said, “We are not in the business of giving that [Reddit’s content] away for free.” That stance makes sense. But it also ignores the reality that all of Reddit’s content has been given to it for free by its millions of users. Further, it leaves aside the fact that the content has been orchestrated by its thousands of volunteer moderators.

touché

  • fubo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    It’s literally not “Reddit’s content”. Says so in the user agreement:

    You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content […]

    Huffman should be careful calling it “Reddit’s content” — by claiming ownership, he’s arguably taking on liability.

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      2 years ago

      The [stuff in brackets] is editorial. That’s when they add on their own reference to something said elsewhere.

      In this case, huffpig didn’t actually say content. He said data.

      It’s actually worse, because it dehumanizes everyone on reddit, via that the data is our only value to him.

      So, fuck huffpig

      • mglap@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think the word “data” also supports the theory that this is actually about training data for LLMs rather than ad revenue. If it was actually about 3rd party apps, then why not just require all apps to feed the ads? But according to the Apollo developer, there wasn’t even a way to fetch the ads through the API.

        I think spez saw what OpenAI/Microsoft were accomplishing using parsed data and got dollar signs in his eyes. The irony is that OpenAI probably already ripped every comment off Reddit up until now, and don’t really need more going forward.

        • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          I mean it’s also true that they could just have read the web pages, but the API actually cost reddit less than rendering the full web page for all the data.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            That’s just the thing, it has nothing to do with API or server cost. It’s all about presenting ads and collecting user data.

            • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yea, it’s clearly not about just money, because they could have fed ads via the API, or made it part of reddit premium for the user to keep using the API ad free. I can’t say how many people would have rage quite anyway, but the way they’re doing it doesn’t give anyone who likes other apps any reason to pay reddit money, that’s for sure. And does inspire people to leave.

              I hesitate to say I have all these ideas that would have worked better because I haven’t seen their research on their existing premium paid product or expected conversion rates for API access (at per user monthly subs), so maybe the research says they’ve got ALL the paying members they’ll ever get and they need to force ever more ads instead for money - but given they’ve had years and years to think about this and have tried almost nothing makes me think they’re either very unimaginative or just are bad at innovation or even just trying stuff other people already have except for tunnel vision on ads.

        • icesentry@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          If it was actually about AI they would have solved the issue quickly by offering different prices for 3rd party apps. The fact that they aren’t doing that clearly shows that they want to kill apps.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        They really should be paying, all of these data companies should. No other business gets away with not paying for the materials they use to make their product. You can’t build and sell a car without paying for the nuts and bolts.

        Data companies like Facebook and Google keep telling us the data we give them has no value, yet they use that data they collect for free and sell for pure profit to become some of the wealthiest businesses in the world.

    • renrenPDX@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Why not post the whole sub-section:
      5. Your Content
      The Services may contain information, text, links, graphics, photos, videos, audio, streams, or other materials (“Content”), including Content created with or submitted to the Services by you or through your Account (“Your Content”). We take no responsibility for and we do not expressly or implicitly endorse, support, or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any of Your Content.

      By submitting Your Content to the Services, you represent and warrant that you have all rights, power, and authority necessary to grant the rights to Your Content contained within these Terms. Because you alone are responsible for Your Content, you may expose yourself to liability if you post or share Content without all necessary rights.

      You retain any ownership rights you have in Your Content, but you grant Reddit the following license to use that Content:

      When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit. You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.

      Any ideas, suggestions, and feedback about Reddit or our Services that you provide to us are entirely voluntary, and you agree that Reddit may use such ideas, suggestions, and feedback without compensation or obligation to you.

      Although we have no obligation to screen, edit, or monitor Your Content, we may, in our sole discretion, delete or remove Your Content at any time and for any reason, including for violating these Terms, violating our Content Policy, or if you otherwise create or are likely to create liability for us.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        I didn’t post it all because (1) it’s long and most of it isn’t directly pertinent, and (2) this is the Web, we have hyperlinks. :)

  • Sinnerman@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    2 years ago

    “There is nothing special about Reddit except its community and the content the community created.”

    This is the fundamental truth that rules all others.

    • Drops_of_dew@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 years ago

      It used to just be a regular forum for people to post and discuss. It was special because of the upvote/downvote karma system. The user count got money hungry people’s attention, it went corporate and it became a place to take in revenue.

      Now people have learned from it, and used it to create their own forums based on the structure of Reddit.

      The thing that made Reddit special was it was everything you wanted all in one place, instead of having multiple forums on multiple different websites for multiple different interests, it was all on Reddit.

      Now we have the fediverse, it’s multiple different websites, that follow the same principles, and they all work harmoniously with one another.

      Just like nature finds a way, genuine humanity finds way too, even on the internet.

  • mrmanager@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sure - only people who create content give it away for free.

    Reddit is in the business of taking that free labor and telling people they own that data and set rules for it. Got it.

    • HerrLewakaas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 years ago

      Personally I’ve left it for good. Lemmy is so active and diverse I don’t miss reddit at all. I’m still sometimes looking at it through Boost, but come July 1st I’ll be gone forever

      • mrmanager@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m also using Boost until July 1st and then if it stops working, I’m out of there for good. Lemmy is quite good already and I don’t want to support Steve and the other dousches over at reddit.

        Lemmy is hopefully just the beginning of fediverse growing more and more with new platforms and services.

        • Thanks4Nothing@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It’s so funny. I have bounced between Boost and Sync for years. I really love them both. I think I tend to gravitate to boost for more graphical or visual subs, and I like Sync for commenting or reading more text focused content. I have paid for pro lifetime on both. I miss them, and am excited that Sync is trying to make the jump.

          Has the Boost dev(Ruben?) Officially said the app is shutting down? Ppl keep saying it, but I haven’t seen an official post or announcement. Reddit keeps saying “we are still working with some devs”…

          • eleitl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m using an open source client on an open source tablet to connect to an open source server instance with federation. It’s not a coincidence, though it took some time for it to happen.

      • Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        The real secret is that a smaller community is generally a better quality experience if you’re looking to interact with other members of the community.

        Reddit isn’t trying to foster communities, it is trying to foster content farming so that the masses of casual users can just scroll and look at ads.

      • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m planning to stay active on Lemmy, but I am a bit worried. I feel like the engagement on here has dropped the last few days as Reddit’s traffic mostly recovered.

        July will be another big test, so we’ll see.

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          It feels like engagement is increasing to me, even in a few days. I think you’re right, though, Jul 1 will be the test.

  • Ketchup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’d hate to see the community I helped build be destroyed. However, I will love watching the folks that made it great join the federation! Here’s to us!

    • Rising5315@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I feel like Reddit has been teetering for a while.

      It’s been a great move. I have been back to Reddit a couple times since and the anger is striking after being here for a bit.

  • codus@leby.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I wonder who owns the content posted on Lemmy. I haven’t seen it explicitly called out as Creative Commons or any other license.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Massively underrated comment. I know legalese isn’t going to be super popular around here, but we can still clarify & enshrine some fundamenatl values here to shore off corporate interests, in the same spirit as copy left. Just because creative Commons are common, and GDPR protects things implicitly (albeit completely untested–perhaps even problematic), that doesn’t mean they don’t warrant mention and protection.

      • koreth@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        GDPR protects things implicitly (albeit completely untested–perhaps even problematic)

        I will grab my popcorn the first time someone seriously tries to pursue a GDPR erasure request for their fediverse content. I don’t think it’s even possible to honor such a request in theory, let alone in practice, given that nodes can come and go from the network and when they go, they could easily keep their local copies of everything.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          In theory you’d have to send a GDPR request to every instance.

      • whileloop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Speaking of, how are regulators / governments going to deal with Lemmy? Virtually all existing legislation is intended to deal with centralized stuff run by companies, not federalized. By some regards, there may be actual legal issues with the current setup.

        Lemmy by its nature is unlikely to ever face the scrutiny that corporate-owned platforms do, but that doesn’t mean we should be unprepared.

        Edit: …virtually all existing legislation…

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well, Lemmy is, when you get down to the technical level, centralized.

          Each instance is a centralized unit, with a server owned and run by an individual or a group of people. Each instance replicates and hosts content. Since each instance provides the content directly, they are responsible for the content, same as Twitter is responsible for the content on Twitter, even if the content is a screenshot/copy of a Reddit post.

          So I, as a feddit.de user am subject of feddit.de’s TOS, since I am legally their customer. feddit.de is responsible to clean illegal content from their instance and from all replications from other instances that they are hosting.

          Regular social-media-related law totally applies to Lemmy, with two caveats. Many of these laws have a triviality limit, meaning they won’t apply to networks below a certain user count/yearly revenue.

          Federation means that each instance is technically a separate social network, so their user count is not added together. And since all Lemmy instances I know are non-profit/non-commercial, there is also no meaningful revenue.

          But for laws without these limits (e.g. GDPR) there is no salvation for Lemmy, and once Lemmy becomes big enough for anyone to notice, there will be lawsuits.

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            GDPR doesn’t create avenues for lawsuits. GDPR is managed by local Information Commissioners Offices, who levy fines.

              • TWeaK@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                That doesn’t really say that you have any specific action just from having your rights breached. It’s not like in the US where you can sue for hurt feelings and get punitive damages - you have to have actual, costed damages to claim for.

                The trouble with actual damages is that it’s near impossible to prove that the breach of your rights directly caused the damages, if you can even put a monetary value to it. The potential for it to happen is not enough for a claim to succeed. So, in practice, in almost every circumstance the only avenue is a report to the DPA and hope they levy a fine.

                • Square Singer@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  take legal action against the company or organisation File an action directly in court against a company/organisation if you believe that it has violated your data protection rights.

                  That’s from the link.

                  I said, you can be sued for GDPR violations. “Take legal action” = “sue someone”.

                  Also, yes, you can very much sue for emotional damages and real damages due to GDPR violations. The difference between US and EU is that emotional damages in the EU are a few €100 and not a few 1000 or even 10000.

                  But if you do really leak data (e.g. passwords) and these are then abused for something else, then you are talking about serious costs.

                  Here you got a link about how the European Court of Justice confirms that emotional damages for GDPR violations is a thing: https://noyb.eu/en/court-justice-confirmed-there-no-threshold-gdpr-damages

        • jmp242@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 years ago

          I would imagine the same laws that apply to email servers or voip services or any other existing federated service like usenet…

  • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    2 years ago

    Great article, except super cringe at the end suggesting Beehaw specifically and not saying “Lemmy” or something to indicate it is part of a wider service.

    Unless Reddit reverses course … a new site, such as the user-funded Beehaw … will take its place.

    • Wintermute@lemmy.villa-straylight.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Honestly kind of a hilarious misunderstanding of Lemmy too. Beehaw will never replace reddit because they explicitly do not want to and have already taken aggressive steps to make sure that they don’t (i.e. detailed application requirements and defederating multiple instances).

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The application requirements are merely a way to manage growth and keep bots out. Defederation is also an essential management tool that all major instances are utilising. Both of these are being used to restrict bots and trolling.

    • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Because people keep unintentionally hyping up Beehaw, they do not understand that Beehaw is nothing special and that everyone would be better off unsubscribing from its communities to let it be its own island since it doesn’t like the whole federation concept anyway (at least not since it finished exploiting it to grow to its current user count). I already unsubscribed from all their communities after their dick move.

      • Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I was reading these comments on beehaw yesterday defending the defederation from shitjustworks because of T_D sub with like 10 subscribers and I was already getting a little worried thinking what I’ve gotten myself into. Glad to see the view on this on other instances seems a bit more balanced and reasonable. Beehaw seems toxic as hell.

        • Iapar@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Toxic? Do you know what this word means?

          They made it their stated goal to create a safespace for people who are, for example, in a vulnerable state.

          • eleitl@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            They should defederate entirely and become an island. The world is not a safe place.

              • eleitl@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I see that their mass defederation is potentially temporary.

                But the point that hairtrigger defederation results in fragmentation, up to the point of insularisation remains valid. Islands naturally tend to become obscure.

      • nighty@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m kinda out of the loop here, but what happened to beehaw? What did I miss out on?

        • Celivalg@iusearchlinux.fyi
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Long story short, they don’t have the mod capacity to micromanage evry single comment, since unless you defederate, you have to moderate every comment and post that gets seen by your instance, so the whole fediverse basically, and they just can’t do that.

          Some instances have attracted some toxic behaviors and federating with them added an influx of comments that weren’t in line with their rules.

          They decided to defederate all the big instances that didn’t filter sing ups.

          It’s a blanket solution, and honestly, I don’t blame them for it, lemmy moderation is a bit hell.

          Their rules are a bit strict, but I approve of what they are trying to do, creating a “safe” space… The rest of the fediverse is a bit of a far-west with anything goes being the rule…

          • TWeaK@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s a blanket solution, and honestly, I don’t blame them for it, lemmy moderation is a bit hell.

            Exactly. And beehaw is far from the only instance that has had to defederate to limit not attacks and trolling. Beehaw just did it more than others.

            There’s nothing to stop instances refederating later, and no doubt this will happen when the dust settles and the tools are developed.

      • klieg2323@lemmy.piperservers.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Nothing of value was lost. Let the idiots who think defederation and banning is the answer to everything wall themselves off

      • ram@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Defederating is literally a part and feature of the fediverse.

          • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            hey man, just so you’re aware ( because maybe you don’t see it) your tone comes off retaliatory when all beehaw did is try to protect their community using the tools available. is that wrong? why would you follow that with unsubscribing from good communities there? I’m not getting it.

      • Serinus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The biggest mistake* Mastodon made was that they promoted “Mastodon” instead of a specific instance.

        I think they’re absolutely right to just pick an instance and recommend that, or if that instance doesn’t work, try this other one. Which instance they pick is not what I care about more than just picking some specific instance. Beehaw may or may not have been the best choice, but I’m glad they picked one.

        *I understand why Mastodon wanted to be neutral, but it was horrible for onboarding people.

        • LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Agreed. As someone not into microblogging, I just wanted to check what Mastodon was about when the Twitter drama went on, but couldn’t be bothered understanding federation just to check a site out.

  • mo_ztt ✅@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago

    Another relevant quote from the article:

    There is nothing special about Reddit except its community and the content the community created. Its software is trivial. Unless Reddit reverses course, Reddit will join Digg, MySpace, and LiveJournal in the dustbin of social network history, and a new site, such as the user-funded Beehaw, or an old one, such as Digg, will take its place.

    I would actually revise that to “Its software is trivial, and in some respects notably lacking.”

  • fuser@quex.cc
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    the reality that all of Reddit’s content has been given to it for free by its millions of users

    Anyone with a moral compass (and business sense) would have devised a token equity plan to appease 3rd parties and mods. Oh well – thanks for all the new users, spez. see you on myspace.

  • z3n0x@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    positively surprised by general news coverage of this whole thing

    • silicon_reverie@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      To be fair, much of the modern news cycle comes from Reddit. When I worked as a tech journalist years ago, we had half a dozen bots watching relevant subs and alerting us to breaking news. We’d clean it up, fact-check, call sources for comment, and do all the “journalistic” stuff you’d expect, just like with any other story, but Reddit was absolutely part of our workflow. You’ve got to look for news wherever the news is happening, be that a press release, a leak on twitter, or a convo on Reddit, and frequently it happened to be Reddit.

      These days you even have tictokers cutting out the middleman and straight-up reading r/AmITheAsshole posts over Minecraft footage for views. Is it any surprise that news sites are commenting on their content firehose being turned off?

    • Realtrain@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It kind of makes sense. Reddit is one of the most visited websites in the world. It has more DAUs than Twitter.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’m here to watch the collapse. And when I see Spez on the side of the street, begging for change because greed cost him his site and his credibility, I’ll unzip my pants and top off his alms cup with hot, frothy piss.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    I just blanked 4200 posts of MY CONTENT.

    The fuck is spez trying to do charging me for my own work.

    • nameisnotimportant@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      How did you do it? I’ve heard of some attempts and people said that their posts were restored shortly after so I’m unsure on how to proceed

      • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        The Reddit API has had (for about 2 years now AFAIK) a soft rate limit of 1 edit per 5 seconds.

        Original PowerDeleteSuite doesn’t respect that, so most edits get silently dropped.

        I ran this fork, which runs only 1 per 5 seconds. Had to leave a browser tab open for a few hours, but it worked.

        I first did a ‘dry run’ to capture all my content to a CSV file (no rate limit), then overwrote every single comment with “[ Deleted to protest Reddit API changes ]”

  • ghariksforge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I don’t think the loss of moderators will be a huge problem. I suspect mods actually drove people away from Reddit rather than retaining them.

    What is an existential threat for Reddit is the emergence of competing platforms.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Moderators are just users of reddit. Reddit keeps trying to drive a wedge between users and mods, but really the problem mods were always the powermods that reddit supported and often installed on major subreddits.

      As usual, the problem is class. Mods are middle class, users are working class. These two groups can easily get along just fine. It’s the rulers (admin) and upper class (mods) who cause all the problems in reddit society.

      • Rising5315@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Definitely. A lot of Reddit mods, or the “landed gentry”, are mods because they likely made the sun because they had a niche interest they were carving out a forum for.

        In the same groups a found a lot of the mods were people who participated in the community a lot. And then the others that participated were the first to get added to the mod list.

        Most of the time on most of the subreddits that aren’t defaults and don’t regularly hit the front page the mods are just users who love that particular subject, idea, whatever.

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 years ago

          See I think that “landed gentry” bollocks really refers to reddit’s installed powermods. Most mods are not landed gentry, they’re regular farmers who have cultivated the community.

    • j0s3f@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Have you ever visited an unmoderated sub? Without moderators, reddit would turn to shit instantly.