• Sundial@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    The difference between you and me is I actually took a look at your sources. And like I said that one was not at all relevant or helpful given its age. A lot happened since 1936.

    Also, I took a look at Blackshirts and Reds while we’ve been going back and forth. Chapter 5 actually supports the numbers I’ve read I’m wikipedia, so thanks for reaffirming it’s reliability.

    Honestly, what are you even trying to argue with me about? I don’t even get the point of all the conversations we’ve been having in this thread.

    • Bureaucrat [pup/pup's, null/void]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      The difference between you and me is I actually took a look at your sources.

      The difference between you and me is that I actually look at my own sources.

      And like I said that one was not at all relevant or helpful given its age. A lot happened since 1936.

      Like I said it is relevant as it describes the soviet gulag system. You also haven’t looked at it apart from briefly skimming the year. Double also - You asked what you should be reading and I provided you texts, you’re now trying to worm your way into some weird argument about the sources not being “relevant” despite us not having any discussion to relate to. There’s nothing to debunk or discuss since all you’ve done is postulate that [insert common unsourced red scare propaganda] and that you have that from wikipedia. Which I dismissed, which made you ask what you should be reading instead, which led me to making a bit of an effort in giving you some good places to start, which has now led to more dishonesty from you. Not knowing something is okay, you do not have to be so defensive.
      This is also just weird, considering that another source I linked you was this brief breakdown of a few reports. This one should be right up your alley - It’s written without academic rigour by anonymous and biased users using no first hand sources, cherrypicking quotes to serve their own agenda. Just like your lovely wikipedia!

      Also, I took a look at Blackshirts and Reds while we’ve been going back and forth. Chapter 5 actually supports the numbers I’ve read I’m wikipedia, so thanks for reaffirming it’s reliability. Honestly, what are you even trying to argue with me about? I don’t even get the point of all the conversations we’ve been having in this thread.

      My god. Wisdom is chasing you, but you’re too fast.

    • ShimmeringKoi [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      You haven’t taken a look at your sources dude, this is the intellectual equivalent of “My girlfriend goes to another school.” You’re bullshitting and dodging at every junction, incapable of answering a single specific question about anything you’ve supposedly read, and are allowing your ego to lash out in self-defense upon being confronted with the fact that what you actually know about the USSR is a litany of fairy-tale cliches.

      I wonder what you’re certain you know about North Korea too, I could use a laugh