TheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agoMozilla Firefox removes "Do Not Track" Feature support: Here's what it means for your Privacywindowsreport.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up187arrow-down16file-textcross-posted to: technik@feddit.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seprivacyguides@lemmy.oneprivacy@lemmy.worldfirefox@fedia.iofirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.world
arrow-up181arrow-down1external-linkMozilla Firefox removes "Do Not Track" Feature support: Here's what it means for your Privacywindowsreport.comTheTwelveYearOld@lemmy.world to Privacy@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 days agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technik@feddit.orghackernews@lemmy.bestiver.seprivacyguides@lemmy.oneprivacy@lemmy.worldfirefox@fedia.iofirefox@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.world
https://windowsreport.com/mozilla-firefox-removes-do-not-track-feature-support-heres-what-it-means-for-your-privacy/
minus-squareasudoxlinkfedilinkarrow-up105arrow-down1·11 days agoIt means nothing. DNT is being ignored by most websites anyway and is also a fingerprinting metric.
minus-squareryannathans@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·11 days agoAnd yet there’s a brand new one! GPC
minus-squareMadis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·11 days agoAs long as the brand new one is legally binding, why not. And it is at least in California.
It means nothing. DNT is being ignored by most websites anyway and is also a fingerprinting metric.
And yet there’s a brand new one! GPC
As long as the brand new one is legally binding, why not. And it is at least in California.