• stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Yep, their argument against game preservation is that some people may use the preserved games for *shock* recreation!

      That is an idiotic argument.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      26 days ago

      Yep.

      If its possible for someone to choose an older, less expensive game, then that means those games are market competitors for similar modern games, with more mechanics designed to coax money out of you.

      Its basically a hyper charged version of planned obsolesence.