Old, but fun read that argues that today’s programmers are not like typical Engineers and shouldn’t really call themselves that as Engineering requires certification, is subject to government regulation, bear a burden to the public, etc.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Even “software engineer” is a bit sketchy. Should testers start calling themselves “Software doctors”? Lol

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I’m ambivalent. I don’t really care about titles generally, but at least software engineer clearly isn’t anything else.

        That said, while the term software engineer is a lost cause, I wouldn’t be opposed to some comparable, regulated title where the person has to sign off on code bases and is responsible for major flaws. Obviously you wouldn’t use that as a barrier for every piece of code, but as a requirement for handling personal information on a certain scale? (Obviously it would be pointless until you also regulated intentional sharing of information a hell of a lot better, but still.)