• InevitableList@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    We have the power to fine companies up to £18m or 10% of their qualifying worldwide revenue – whichever is greater – and in very serious cases we can apply for a court order to block a site in the UK.

    Firstly I’d expect regulators to focus on the big fish rather than this minnow. Secondly losing 10% of revenue isn’t a huge deal whilst any fines larger than that would get the entire news media rallying behind you. Shutting down the site is premature to say the least.

    That being said I am surprised that this legislation applies to everyone immediately. You’d think they’d start with a high threshold of say 1 million active monthly users and then reduce that each year as practices and technologies get established. It’s ridiculous to expect hobbyists and small scale operations to be able to meet this burden just as easily as multi-trillion pound corporations.

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think independent forums exist in the eyes of many legislators. The internet equals big tech.

      If they accidentally kill off the independent web they won’t even niotice. They’re probably still on X, thinking it’s stikl hip and unaware alternatives even exist. Never mind trying to explain them about independent forums.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Link to the actual forum announcement:

    https://www.lfgss.com/conversations/401475/

    Quote from it:

    On Sunday 16th March 2025 (the last day prior to the Act taking effect) I will delete the virtual servers hosting LFGSS and other communities, and effectively immediately end the approximately 300 small communities that I run, and the few large communities such as LFGSS.

    • aasatru@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This comment was brought to my attention as it was reported for being too dumb to exist.

      As I’m not a moderator of this community, I’ll leave that judgment to others.

      However, I will point out that the Online Safety Act was passed in 2023, towards the end of well over a decade of British politics being dominated by the Tories. Labour only won the election in 2024.

      So, despite popular belief, the liberals are not the ones taking your rights away. Unless you consider Cameron, May, Johnson, Truss, and Sunak to be liberals, of course. Which you might, as nobody using the word “liberal” seems to have even the faintest idea what it means any more.

      The Online Safety Act is not about regulating TikTok, it’s about surveillance underneath a thin veil of protecting children. And it is very much a Tory piece of work.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      This is OSA in the UK, not KOSA in the US. I don’t disagree with you, but this was just British conservatives doing their thing, not based off of US legal precedents.