• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    There you have your explanation. “Sceptical” channels will just question everything without providing real evidence. The Captain always backs up his claims.

    • TheTetrapod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Most science communication YouTube channels engage in debunking (of flat feathers, young earth creationists, pseudoarcheologists, etc.), always with evidence. Just because a bunch of racist pngtubers co-opted the word skeptical 10-15 years ago doesn’t change the meaning of the word itself.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think you have a very uninformed idea about skeptical content. Go find Skeptic’s Guide to the Universe, Skeptics with a K, Be Reasonable, Skeptoid, Bayesian Conspiracy, Squaring the Strange, Monster Talk and others. There is trutherusm crap and then there is looking at evidence.

      Captain D is a fan of this stuff. He attended The Amazing Meeting, a skeptical conference held by the JREF, back when James Randi was still alive.