I usually code in Language or Script
Don’t we all? Amen.
Javascript is basically like Java but with some scripts in it
But what about script java?
That’s 𝒥𝒶𝓋𝒶.
Hey, no cursive here, this is a family instance.
I highly doubt anyone would guess ANSI C is what I’m talking about if I referred to it as C+
The list shows TempleOS’s HolyC was known as C+ before. I am sure that is it
Language
I have job for you “language” programmers.
Requirements; -minimum 8 years of experiences Etc…
my main language is script java
And C‡ is once again not included. For shame.
It’s just C++ without templates. So whatever element you want to put into std::list, it must virtually inherit std::list::value_type. And of course there will be a macro-based list monstrosity inside Boost.
Types being declarable as virtual members is something I want to never hear again
c+=0.5
Ah yes, I too, program in the Language programming language
And then, comes ScriptJava
What kind of programming language is language?
Holy-C used to be called C+, I think.
To be fair, compiling C code with a C++ compiler gets you all the warnings from C++'s strong-typing rules. That’s a big bonus for me, even if it only highlights the areas of your C that are likely to become a maintenance hazard - all those
void*casts want some documentation about what assumptions make them safe. Clang will compile variable-length arrays in C++, so you might want to switch off that warning since you’ve probably intended it. Just means that you can’t use designated initialisers, since C++ uses constructors for that and there’s no C equivalent. I’d be happy describing code that compiles in either situation as “C+”.Also stops anyone using
auto,constexprornullptras variable names, which will help if you want to copy-paste some well-tested code into a different project later.Isn’t
autoa keyword in C?It means something else.
It’s just C with a borrow checker.
Rust-
Well, achually, the Clang compiler along visualcode is planned to compile C++ with a borrow checker implementation.
Also, C is imperative, C++ is object oriented, and Rust is functional programming - which is how they differer fundamentally.
That Rust is the first one with a borrow checker doesn’t make every language (or compiler, as I “well achually” myself) that implements a borrow checker Rust.
It just means they have implemented a borrow checker - most likely at compile time, similarly to how macros are just boilerplate code applied at compile time and that it too is a feature available in many programming languages - or compilers.
It’s “well achually” all the way down.
Also, I wrote all this when I realized the minus was the joke part making fun of c++ lol
I well achually’ed myself into doing a dumb, which is usually what that does. Hopefully somebody gets something out of this.
Thats just HolyC before it became holy
