The U.S. plans to approve an arms package for Israel, including artillery shells, precision bombs, and GPS systems, though production and delivery could take years; Meanwhile, heavy bombs and bulldozer shipments face delays due to concerns over impact on civilians in Gaza
armies can’t exist without hierarchy. as an anarchist, I seek to smash all unjust hierarchy.
What are you talking about.
Suppose you get rid of whatever hierarchy you propose.
Do you not think people will still look to prey on others or control others?
that happens now. I’m proposing that we eliminate systems that make it worse.
Yet you’ve still to propose how or what you want.
All of you’ve done is said no not like that.
I said clearly abolition of all unjust hierarchy.
Care to elaborate?
Can you explain to me the unjust hierarchy you want abolished?
Who determines what is and isn’t unjust?
I want to abolish all unjust hierarchy. if you want to know more, I recommend reading Proudhon, Kropotkin, and Bakunin.
edit: more contemporary literature would include anything by the invisible committee or crimethinc. Haymarket books is a great resource for all kinds of great anarchist literature.
You realise your approach of being reluctant to provide your thoughts, expand on them, or engage in discourse is really not going to help you get people on side for your cause.
Simply providing reading resources isn’t enough as most people (myself included) are not going to go and read these books. If you’ve learned something of value and you think it would make for a better society, then surely you should be passionate about talking about these ideas and enlightening more people.
All you’ve done is alienate me as I don’t know if you’re being obtuse, you can’t regurgitate the points that resonated with you (no shade I struggle with this when debating with right wing colleagues), or that you’re passionate about it at all.
I’m not trying to recruit you. I’m telling you what I think. if you want to know more, you can read what I’ve read.