I believe in Fediverse Supremacy!

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The server owners would take care of the content hosted on their server and would need to filter it based on their local laws (to remove CSAM for example, just like current admins need to do), but otherwise this type of decentralization would make the website pretty much a neutral zone that operates outside of specific laws since the people hosting the content (and its backups) could be located all over the world.

    • CyberEgg
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How’s that different from now?
      Or do you want users to not be banned instancewide for breaking instance rules? Or do you want to abolish instance/server rules aside from local laws altogether?

        • CyberEgg
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Instances = servers. No instances = nowhere to host content. And again, admin roles are a necessity for any server based infrastructure.

            • CyberEgg
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Enlighten me. Where do you want to host stuff?

              • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                33 minutes ago

                It’s all explained in the link I shared, you do like any other website but instead of using multiple servers owned by a single company it’s multiple servers owned by random people and devs can create a front-end to access the data found on those servers.