• Troy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 days ago

    There used to be explorers in the world – people who would accept the risks (known or unknown) and push forward anyway. This is one of those moments.

    As a one-time astronaut candidate that failed to be selected… I’d still go.

    • Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      If the time frame you will be required to be out in space exceeds the time it will take for your eyesight to degrade to a point where it hinders you physically being able to do your work, then that is a problem you can’t just soldier through. There will have to be some sort of solution to this.

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes, but we won’t know what that timeframe is until we send enough people (or animals or whatever) to discover this.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Build a ship and send several monkeys to Mars and back on one of those free return trajectories and see how they fare.

          • Troy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s actually a good idea, provided the monkeys can survive the zero g environment and feed themselves and clean up after themselves and whatever else. Free return is something like 16 months?

            Tangent and some searching yields: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/2.3333?journalCode=jsr – 1.4 years as minimum.

            Sending monkeys on a lunar free return can make logistical sense. I’m not sure Mars does. Trying to keep the monkeys alive will be crazy.

              • Troy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Hahah, just create an entirely new system architecture compared to what is currently being built. Easy! Set back human exploration timelines by decades…

                • Droechai@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  What is currently being built can’t sustain a monkey population to mars anyway, so why not? If the monkey trials are a priority, we need to give them suitable living conditions

                  • Troy@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    3 days ago

                    I’m arguing that monkey trials are not a priority and that we should go straight to people

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              I don’t think a lunar free return trajectory would be long enough to measure this. Because the moon is so close.

              • Troy@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 days ago

                Correct. But a lunar free return trajectory is about the limit of what I’d sent unsupervised monkeys on. ;)