• MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    And yet there’s still a carbon cost attached to eating said fish because you have to catch it. Plants always have a lower cost

    Regardless most aren’t catching their own fish and are eating farmed fish.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That statement is not supported by fact or logic, it’s irrational. You are in a dogma. This is useless.

      It’s like arguing with a religious person “God exist” is their argument, and that’s it. This is the same. So, sorry, I’m out.

      • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Says the guy who can’t understand the carbon cost of an animal is higher than a plant whose energy comes from the sunlight.