What is the point of the fediverse having built-in censorship to ban ideas, views, and opinions? There could be a direct connection between why Mastodon does not attract new users and the totalitarian censorship of the fediverse pushing a monolith barbarian culture.

Looking through posts on the different fediverse services, it seems anything built on ActivityPub will only turn stale in 5 years because it is designed for people who can’t function in society where random individuals can freely reject their statements, so they need the internet to hide away from life.

  • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    There isn’t really a single “fediverse” that decides what’s “allowed”. What your fediverse is depends on where your account is and who they’re federated with. You’re perfectly free to say whatever you want on your own instance and talk to the other people on instances willing to federate with you. The thing is, being mean to people who have done nothing to harm you tends to make you pretty unpopular and make people not want to interact with you, that’s why instances that encourage that tend to not be federated with very many popular instances.

    • Rav Sha'ulOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Do people have a right to disagree with you? When you comment on any subject or topic, whatever it might be, do others have right to not support what you believe in? No marriage or serious relationship can last with restrictions on personal thought. Successful marriages must have room for disagreements.

      • Flamekebab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If we’re talking on the phone and you start talking about stuff that I’m not interested in hearing, I’m allowed to hang up.

        You can disagree all you want, that doesn’t mean I’m required to listen to you.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Yeah, over stuff like what to have for dinner. Not whether some people don’t deserve human rights.

        And let me make this perfectly clear: all people deserve human rights.

      • TurboWafflz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        What? People are allowed to avoid people they have serious disagreements with? You have every right to have whatever unkind opinions you want to have, but that doesn’t mean anyone is required to listen to you or like you. You’re never going to be liked by everyone in the world, but if you can hardly find anyone willing to be around you, it’s probably time to do some self refelction