What is the point of the fediverse having built-in censorship to ban ideas, views, and opinions? There could be a direct connection between why Mastodon does not attract new users and the totalitarian censorship of the fediverse pushing a monolith barbarian culture.

Looking through posts on the different fediverse services, it seems anything built on ActivityPub will only turn stale in 5 years because it is designed for people who can’t function in society where random individuals can freely reject their statements, so they need the internet to hide away from life.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.catEnglish
    2·
    4 hours ago

    At the same time, they do fund open source projects, most notably Immich, which is a fantastic Google Photos alternative. I’m personally okay with using their stuff, and tentatively happy with them as an organization, but I’m keeping a watchful eye on their behavior.

    I couldn’t of said it better, I feel the exact same way. I’m not a complete FOSS zealot, if the source code is open and theres no shady business/trackers that’s good enough for me.

    I am locking this thread to avoid needing to remove misinformation and advocacy from Futo fans who think they should be allowed to redefine a term which there has been consensus about the definition of since before they were born.

    Like I say, it sure sounds to me like OP has a point. I also think this probably wouldn’t happen on a server which didn’t have a strong tradition of the mods determining what opinions people are and aren’t allowed to have.

    People also have a point who are noting that OP is ticking some of the boxes of the “right winger complaining about censorship” bingo card. Personally, that’s not really offensive to me if it’s just someone saying what they think and asking if they’re allowed to say it, but it’s definitely poking a hole in my “yinz are freaking out, he’s just talking about keyboads” theory, I will admit.