• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    Title makes it sound like he gave the info to his buddies who wanted it. No, the people working at DOGE had temporary access for carrying out their assigned work.

    It is very hard to be anti-Elon when you have to fact check and dig into every anti-Elon story. If you just believe the headlines and talk to any skeptical right-winger, you’re gonna look real stupid when Google searches come out

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Oh look, someone who has no fucking clue how the US government works, speaking bullshit with authority, and has the gall to be petulant about it.

      Fuck off.

    • scaramobo@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      And why do they need personal data to carry out their jobs again? Wasn’t this about government efficiency; as in: the bigger picture? Why concern yourself with the specifics of Johnathan Doe?

    • the_tab_key@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Did the people who had “temporary access” have stringent security measures in place such that the access was not misused? No?

      Did they ensure that after the “temporary access” none of these people retained any of said information improperly? No again?

      Did any of the people pass background checks that normal government employees must pass before being given access to said data? No for a third time?

      Is there any reason to trust that they treated the data responsibly other than blind faith? No x4.

      • Placebonickname@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        20 hours ago

        And if it was for an official government business, I suspect We American citizens will have full access to the report in detail of the data’s use…right? Right? ….guys?