• MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    FPTP, used as it was designed, is very well suited to achieving what is stated.

    No, it isn’t, as I said above. The Harper government was elected three times with less than 40% of the popular vote and did all the things that Conservatives do, ran up the deficit, ran up the debt, cut taxes for the rich and corporations, cut services for everyone else, burned decades of scientific research and muzzled government experts to push his christofascist dogmatic agenda, passed unconstitutional laws as a dog whistle to his christofascist base then spent millions of dollars defending them to the Supreme Court only to have 100% of those unconstutitional laws struck down. How is that representing the majority of Canadians when then had the support of less than 40%?

    The current Liberal + NDP agreement government far better represents the will of the people but it’s a quirk of the FPTP system.

    • Rocket@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Harper government

      Yeah, no. The fact that you can actually name the dictator tells that this is not FPTP as it was designed. That is how it has come to be used, because people don’t want to express their will, but that has already been talked about to death.

      Again, the FPTP system was designed to have the people select one representative who gathers locally to talk about their concerns and objectives with the local people. The representative then takes the result of that to Ottawa to combine with all of the other localities that have done the same to reach an ultimate consensus. The representative’s actions in Ottawa are recorded to make sure he has honoured what took place locally.

      That is not how we use it. It has been bastardized to the point that it makes no sense. But we could if wanted to have the will of the majority represented. There is nothing stopping us other than doing the democratic work a democracy expects. The only possibly better way to have the will represented is to have us all travel to Ottawa and all gather together. That doesn’t scale so well, though, and it’s a long way from Vancouver.

      The current Liberal + NDP agreement government far better represents the will of the people but it’s a quirk of the FPTP system.

      To be fair, it’s also quirky that you have been able to determine the will of the people as they don’t usually want to express their will. Typically they’d rather let someone else figure it out. Hence how we got here.

      • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The fact that you can actually name the dictator tells that this is not FPTP as it was designed.

        You see? This is the kind of nonsense that is disconnected from reality. Harper was freely and fairly elected and was defeated in a free and fair election. He was nothing approaching a dictator.

        I’m simply not willing to continue to discuss this with you if you’re not making arguments that are connected to reality.

        Have a good day.

        • Rocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Harper was freely and fairly elected and was defeated in a free and fair election.

          The only time Harper was not elected in a Canadian federal election was the first one he participated in. He resigned from politics about six months after his last election win. Maybe you are trying to imply that the resignation was a defeat? But that did not happen during the election.

          Are you, maybe, talking about an election other than the Canadian federal election?

          He was nothing approaching a dictator.

          It sure seemed like you were trying to say that he had total control over the country at one time. I do not disagree. If that is not the case, why did you bring him up?

            • Rocket@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Funny, as I stopped having a position a while ago. I long moved to trying to figure out your position as it is in no way clear.

              Some pretty simple questions in that last comment that would help clarify things. Is there a reason you are afraid to answer them?

              • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Your positions are so absurd that there is no chance to have a reasonable conversation.

                • Rocket@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  What kind of conversation would we have had if, hypothetically, they were not absurd?

                  • Rocket - “[…]”
                  • MapleEngineer - “Yup, that’s how it is.”
                  • Rocket - “Yup, sure is.”
                  • MapleEngineer - “Yup. Guess that’s all there is to say about that.”
                  • Rocket - “Yup.”

                  Reasonable conversation is predicated on starting with the absurd. I give you the benefit of the doubt that you are trying, in good faith, to provide information to take us from the absurd to something sensible, but I am honestly not clear in what you are trying to say. My attempts to figure it out have been stonewalled.

                  • MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    MapleEngineer: I’m going to come over and fuck your wife.

                    Rocket: The fuck you are.

                    MapleEngineer: Let’s negotiate and find some middle ground. Maybe she can just give me a blowjob.

                    When your opening position is absurd there is literally no room for discussion. You always take the most ridiculously extreme and absurd position. That leaves no room for reasonable discussion.