A gun rights group sued New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) and other state officials on Saturday over an emergency order banning firearms from being carried in public in Albuquerque.

The National Association for Gun Rights, alongside Albuquerque resident Foster Haines, filed suit just one day after Grisham announced the public health order temporarily suspending concealed and open carry laws in the city.

The group argued that the order violates their Second Amendment rights, pointing to the Supreme Court’s decision last year in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.

  • ColeSloth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is it still feasible to see a person coming into town from a mile off on a horse and stopping him to take his guns? Are only like 20 people a day coming in and out of this city?

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I believe the above is referencing a law that required the owner to surrender guns. Not a checkpoint. Therefore if someone was caught with firearms in the city without permission by the sheriff they were known to be breaking the law. Pretty much the same as is happening now: if you see someone with a gun in Albuquerque, they are a criminal.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then make it a fine punishable by 10% of your yearly income. Sure, you can carry a gun in the town, but if they catch you with it, you’re gonna pay a stiff penalty.

      • ColeSloth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of any debates or criticism or discussion you could possibly make…making a penalty that has no effect of an unemployed person that’s most likely to mug or rob a person for having a gun by far has to be the stupidest most illogical thing you could have said. I can recognize or accept different viewpoints, but you’re just a moron.

        • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s literally what they did in Tombstone.

          The fine was $25 dollars in 1870. In 2023 that’s the equivalent of $583.38.

          Yep. I’m the stupid one alright.

          • ColeSloth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And what percentage of their income was a fixed fine of $25? Yes. You’re the stupid one.

            • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              5% of their yearly income. That is still huge. I make 100k and a 5% fine would be $5,000.

              No thanks. That would definitely make me keep my pistola home.

              Have a good day. You seem to be upset about something, what with all the insults and whatnot you keep throwing out. Go smoke a joint or rub one out. Peace out.

          • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Still criminalizing simply carrying a gun, a practice often done by people who don’t use them criminally, which still primarily affects the poor and disenfranchised in marginalized over-policed neighborhoods, and even if the fine is $5, idk about you but I can’t afford a day off of work and court fees on top of that. Luckily I do have a car to get to court but not everyone is so lucky.