Example: Instead of “123-456-7890”

its: “JohnSmith234@Washington.DC.USA”

  • 2xsaiko
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    It’s slow but stagnation is a disingenuous way of putting it. https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

    NAT brings no security, especially in this scenario. If you want to prevent malicious software from opening ports, you use a public facing firewall on your gateway. Which you should have for IPv4 as well.