Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world to

Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 6 days ago

Even without the USA, Nato would still win in a fight

www.telegraph.co.uk

cross-posted to:
europe@lemmy.ml

70

Even without the USA, Nato would still win in a fight

www.telegraph.co.uk

Elrecoal19_0@lemmy.world to

Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 6 days ago

cross-posted to:
europe@lemmy.ml

The numbers don’t lie. But would Nato have the endurance to win in the long run?

Chat

Valmond@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
English
arrow-up
7
arrow-down
1·
6 days ago
Only if nato attacks, which it won’t do as it’s a defense pact.
- Bademantel@lemmy.world
  link
  fedilink
  English
  arrow-up
  7·
  6 days ago
  I’m not saying NATO would but they did intervene in Kosovo. That was not defensive. There’s some wiggle room in being a defensive pact.
  - Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3·
    6 days ago
    Fair point, I actually don’t know how the USA got involved in Kosovo.

Europe@feddit.org

europe@feddit.org

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !europe@feddit.org

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don’t overly distort the content.
No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don’t post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don’t troll nor incite hatred. Don’t look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia’s List of fallacies.
No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add “/s” when you’re being sarcastic (and don’t use it to break rule no. 3).
If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They’re cool, you should subscribe there too!)
Don’t evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don’t show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1.53K users / day
3.49K users / week
6.39K users / month
10.2K users / 6 months
130 local subscribers
2.49K subscribers
1.98K Posts
14.4K Comments
Modlog