I have a bit of a knee-jerk reaction that Star Trek should be looking forward rather than backward, but I also love SNW so that’s obviously not a hard and fast rule. You’re right that this could be done well, but I’m very skeptical that it would be.
My biggest concern is that they would over aggrandise the character. Kirk was always a big personality, but he was also very flawed and human. I don’t want to watch every other character fawning over the legendary Captain Kirk, or see him battling the Borg at 95.
I also don’t want to see an uncanny valley digital mockery, I can’t stand those.
But if they came up with something like Relics was for Scotty - an intimate, meaningful story that put a button on the character’s life and didn’t feel the need to build it up as some galaxy-shattering event - I could be into that. But I doubt that’s what they’re considering.
I have a bit of a knee-jerk reaction that Star Trek should be looking forward rather than backward, but I also love SNW so that’s obviously not a hard and fast rule. You’re right that this could be done well, but I’m very skeptical that it would be.
My biggest concern is that they would over aggrandise the character. Kirk was always a big personality, but he was also very flawed and human. I don’t want to watch every other character fawning over the legendary Captain Kirk, or see him battling the Borg at 95.
I also don’t want to see an uncanny valley digital mockery, I can’t stand those.
But if they came up with something like Relics was for Scotty - an intimate, meaningful story that put a button on the character’s life and didn’t feel the need to build it up as some galaxy-shattering event - I could be into that. But I doubt that’s what they’re considering.
I take it you’ve seen 765874 - Unification? The de-aging is still noticeably jarring, but a worthwhile little gut punch send off.