LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 14 hours agoThe eternal debate over the M10 Booker (by @EODHappyCaptain)sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square8fedilinkarrow-up169arrow-down13
arrow-up166arrow-down1imageThe eternal debate over the M10 Booker (by @EODHappyCaptain)sh.itjust.worksLOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square8fedilink
minus-squareCarmakazi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·14 hours agoIn technical terms it is a tank. We are refusing to call it a tank I assume because of some organizational/order of battle reason. Its not a tank, its an infantry fire support weapon or whatever the fuck.
minus-squareVerifiedSource@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·12 hours agoIt’s a tank. It’s not a main battle tank.
In technical terms it is a tank.
We are refusing to call it a tank I assume because of some organizational/order of battle reason. Its not a tank, its an infantry fire support weapon or whatever the fuck.
It’s a tank. It’s not a main battle tank.