Summary
Leland Dudek, Trump’s newly appointed Social Security Administration (SSA) chief, has reportedly ordered plans for a 50% workforce cut, potentially closing field offices and delaying benefits.
Critics, including Rep. John Larson and advocacy groups, warn this move will disrupt services for seniors and disabled Americans. Five regional SSA commissioners are resigning in protest.
The cuts align with Elon Musk’s push for AI-driven government efficiency, despite concerns over fraud prevention and accessibility.
Critics argue this is a backdoor benefit cut to fund tax breaks for the wealthy.
Under the agreement that it would be there for us though.
I’m glad that people are getting payments, but I want it too; it’s a benefit that we were promised for good reasons.
They’re right to be pissed that they paid into it without getting that benefit.
That I can agree with.
I still stand by:
I understand what you are saying, but the typical Republican and libertarian argument against social security is that “it’s my money, I should be able to manage it myself, I can get a better rate of return than the government.”
So if they are going to gut SS without paying us all back, that’s just boldly hypocritical of them. Though that’s not surprising, of course.
It used to be fully funded with the money paid into it. Your current contributions are supposed to be paying for your future security.
https://www.fedsmith.com/2013/10/11/ronald-reagan-and-the-great-social-security-heist/