• CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    True. I think it depends if pasta is the main or just a side dish. But weighing spaghetti on a scale is pretty cumbersome.

    I’m just imagining the infomercial of some guy knocking the plate off the scale and then spaghetti is all over the floor saying there’s got to be a better way and then another guy comes up, and rips off his shirt to reveal his spaghetti portoner nipple ring.

    • thisisbutaname
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That being cumbersome sounds weird to me, but it’s probably due to me always having a scale with a bowl at the ready, so it might be different for others

      • thisisbutaname
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Not a fan of reheating pasta when it’s so easy to make a fresh batch tbh

          • thisisbutaname
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I am one too, but I do like cooking. And I also definitely have nights when I can’t be arsed to put anything together so I get your point

            • skarn
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              And those are the night for beans n tuna.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve never thought about my spaghetti weight wise. I usually put like a bit less than half a 500g box/package. So ~200ish grams. But I usually eat twice out of it so, yeah guess the guy saying 100g is pretty accurate.