• SkaveRat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      no, it’s not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

      • SMITHandWESSON@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no, it’s not even technically correct. You can technically have a carbon negative footprint on the planet

        Lol, really?

        I’m pretty sure you’re not able to contribute to global warming after death…Unless you’re a fucking necromancer!!!

        So the proper Equation would take what they would have contributed if they were alive, and you add that as savings!!!

        PS: If you’re a necromancer and you haven’t reanimated the dead environmentalist back to life, you’re just a fucking dick.🤨

        • SkaveRat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          yes, as you can actively do stuff to remove carbon from the air. you can’t do that when you’re dead