Archiv

Kurzfassung: Sie erreichen etwa 12,3%

  • NIB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    I dont understand all these “we should put solar panels in x”. Sure, we could but that would be less efficient than using proper conventional solar panels. It isnt as if we dont have enough land area for solar panels, that is not the bottleneck, there is plenty of land.

    We had those stupid solar roads, now this. I dont understand. At least transparent solar panels might have some niche uses.

    • the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think the idea here is vertical space > horizontal space.

    • 0ops@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      At some point they could become cheap enough that it’s less about absolutely optimal efficiency and more of a “might as well” thing.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s also an aesthetic thing. In addition to that some houses don’t have enough land or roof space for panels but do for windows. This opens up a lot of possibilities, especially in cities

    • curiousaur@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re forgetting about transmission. That’s one of the biggest hurdles towards a solar future. Putting the generation right next to where the power is used is much more efficient both in transmission, infrastructure and maintenance.

      • NIB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I actually had written a sentence about solar panels being closer to where the power consumption is, as an advantage. But that also implies that you are localizing other parts too, things like batteries. Which is feasible but it complicates things.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly this - there is enough land around where you can build solar. Put it over your parking spaces. Every solar farm is better than a corn field. Use those big industrial roofs. There is enough space

  • unexposedhazard
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    12,3% is recht gut. Die flächen wo das eingesetzt werden könnte sind ja komplett ungenutzt bisher, also is alles über 0% ein fortschritt. Kosten technisch ist halt die frage wie lange es braucht bis sich die dinger rentieren.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Die Flächen sind natürlich nicht wirklich ungenutzt, die Sonneneinstrahlung durch Fenster ist ein wichtiger Teil der Energiebilanz von Gebäuden.