alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 10 months agoAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square46linkfedilinkarrow-up1493arrow-down15
arrow-up1488arrow-down1imageAverage LinkedIn usersh.itjust.worksalphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works to LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square46linkfedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up30arrow-down1·10 months agoTo be somewhat fair, that is a very confusing way to present a score worse than 50%. Who are precisely the people we need to simplify things for.
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·10 months agoI mean… He didn’t even read the percentile number correctly. How do you get an off by one error reading a number
minus-squaregalanthus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·10 months agoThat’s a great system, keeps everyone happy.
minus-squareunexposedhazardlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 months agoThe concept of IQ tests is always under fire (for good and bad reasons) so showing results in this way might keep the people in the bottom 50% from getting mad.
To be somewhat fair, that is a very confusing way to present a score worse than 50%.
Who are precisely the people we need to simplify things for.
I mean… He didn’t even read the percentile number correctly. How do you get an off by one error reading a number
That’s a great system, keeps everyone happy.
The concept of IQ tests is always under fire (for good and bad reasons) so showing results in this way might keep the people in the bottom 50% from getting mad.