tripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agoYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.caimagemessage-square49linkfedilinkarrow-up1831arrow-down118
arrow-up1813arrow-down1imageYouTubers in their thumbnailslemmy.catripper@lemmy.ca to Trippin' Through Time@lemmy.caEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square49linkfedilink
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·1 year agoI hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 year agoIt’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoI know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
minus-squarefederal reverse@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoBe that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
minus-squaresamus12345@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.
I hate that useless “nobody:” Glad it went out of style. If nobody said nothing, then everybody said something. The still useless but correct way would be “everybody:”
It’s a shorthand for “nobody asked for this but [person/group] do it anyway:”
I know, it’s just very poorly done. You can remove it every single time and it changes nothing about the joke.
Be that as it may, “everyone:” is not a good replacement.
It’s more accurate, but yes, they both suck.