I might write a summary later

  • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Science-y types do so much damage when they venture into social or political topics. You just know theres some bright-eyed youngin who will uncritically transfer over the esteem they have for their science communication & just accept their premise without second thought.

    The crazy part is that they have so little to gain from it, much to lose, and yet… All the cred she had from making quality, seemingly-informative content vanished with one video. Now, even if she were to present valid info on science topics, I’d forever be skeptical of her basic ability to vet information. I doubt theres an equivalent converse effect within the capitalism fanboy demographic. All she had to do was nothing.

    I have a hypothesis that this phenomena of science types overestimating their ability to draw conclusions in the social sciences is a result of STEM-y people persistently being told they are smart for being relatively competent with more concrete subjects, making them far less likely to negatively assess their understanding of the more squishy world. Thoughts?

    • iie [they/them, he/him]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think part of it is that they underestimate the complexity of the topic. I think Sabine doesn’t know what she doesn’t know, and then she’s too overconfident to realize it because neoliberal narratives are fucking crammed into every conceivable corner of human discourse — and if they’re that ubiquitous, they must be really well vetted and they must be fuckin true!

    • space_comrade [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I have a hypothesis that this phenomena of science types overestimating their ability to draw conclusions in the social sciences is a result of STEM-y people persistently being told they are smart for being relatively competent with more concrete subjects, making them far less likely to negatively assess their understanding of the more squishy world.

      This is absolutely 100% a thing. I’m a software dev and every other colleague is like this to some extent, they’ll make the most puddle-deep analysis of a societal problem backed up by nothing but their personal biases and think they’re fucking sociological geniuses.

    • Philosoraptor [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Physics is the absolute worst with this, too. When I was doing my postdoc in a climate lab, by far the greatest amount of pushback against climate science as a discipline (at least internally) came from the physics department. They sometimes think that since physics is in some sense the “most fundamental” science, they have a right to pontificate on anything else since everything is, at bottom, a physical system. Combined with the fact that they deal with mathematically sophisticated but frequently highly idealized or constrained models–and thus are skeptical of complexity in general–this sometimes gives them the attitude that they can pick up any other discipline and do it better than genuine experts. It’s a pretty pervasive problem.

    • Melonius [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I said it in a previous thread about her, I think she’s intentionally misrepresenting this. She did some shady stuff with climate change which is science. She doesn’t deny it but talks it down for her audience.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have a hypothesis that this phenomena of science types overestimating their ability to draw conclusions in the social sciences is a result of STEM-y people persistently being told they are smart for being relatively competent with more concrete subjects, making them far less likely to negatively assess their understanding of the more squishy world. Thoughts?

      STEMlords get told their shit don’t stink, which cultivates a form of arrogance. The funny thing is that this happens enough that once they get old, they start doing the same shit to STEM fields that they have no expertise in. It starts with the social sciences and the humanities when they are younger, but by the time they’re old, they become full-blown cranks who think their expertise in electrical engineering makes them an expert on the efficacy of vaccines.

    • plinky [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      In first minutes of climate change video she says we can’t stop using cars. This is a “scientist”. Idk why people bother

  • Microtom [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Capitalism is literal extortion. It’s the exploitation of the cost of producing redundancy, which lacks reasonable justification. Producing redundancy is what they menace workers with in order to receive ransoms.

    For example, a landlord purchases a home to transform into a rental property. He asks consumers to pay him a ransom to be able to access the captured property. If they refuse, they have to produce a second house to fulfill the same amount of demand. Producing two houses to only be able to use one is twice the cost, a way higher price than the price of the ransom. So the ransom get paid to avoid producing redundancy. It’s extortion.

  • axont [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Paul Cockshott is an unrepentant TERF who hangs around on Mumsnet, Britain’s foremost TERF forum. I’ve also watched him spew transphobic garbage in several leftist Facebook groups I’m in. He’s directly told a trans friend of mine she’s not a real woman through a comment he posted. He is every bad part of the worst sorts of transphobes and this should disqualify him from being a serious leftist voice. Fuck Paul Cockshott and fuck the island of white devils he came from

    • Tachanka [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      paul cockshott isn’t wrong when he says capitalism is bad just because he also happens to be a transphobe (calling him a TERF is too dignified since the RF implies that he’s a radical feminist, but he’s not even that). but yes I agree we should post comrade hakim’s takedown of sabine instead