sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 个月前Google Receives Piracy Shield Orders to Block Pirate Sites in Public DNS * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comexternal-linkmessage-square22linkfedilinkarrow-up195arrow-down10cross-posted to: piracy@zerobytes.monsterpiracy@lemmit.onlinetorrentfreak@sh.itjust.worksaudiobookbay@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkGoogle Receives Piracy Shield Orders to Block Pirate Sites in Public DNS * TorrentFreaktorrentfreak.comsabreW4K3@lazysoci.al to Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish · 6 个月前message-square22linkfedilinkcross-posted to: piracy@zerobytes.monsterpiracy@lemmit.onlinetorrentfreak@sh.itjust.worksaudiobookbay@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squarereluctant_squidd@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·6 个月前You are 100% correct. The issue isn’t the infrastructure per se, but the usage of it. By decentralizing, I guess I mean finding a way to remove the ability for a mega company like Google from being able to dominate the playfield. The percentage of internet users that can or will bother to run their own DNS is way too low. How easily DNS can be manipulated by any network for the average end user is the blessing and the curse it seems.
You are 100% correct. The issue isn’t the infrastructure per se, but the usage of it.
By decentralizing, I guess I mean finding a way to remove the ability for a mega company like Google from being able to dominate the playfield.
The percentage of internet users that can or will bother to run their own DNS is way too low.
How easily DNS can be manipulated by any network for the average end user is the blessing and the curse it seems.