• TehPers@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    If everything got updated like this, then that’s an awesome change. What made Aero so nice was that it didn’t interfere with legibility, while Glass threw legibility out the window. Striving for a proper foreground to background contrast ratio should be the bare minimim for a company like Apple, and this improves that significantly.

  • Lime Buzz (fae/she)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    As long as it’s an option that’s okay. We quite like the look of the original somewhat so as long as we can have that version and make adjustments as necessary then it’s okay.

      • unique_hemp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t get the downvotes, Apple is religious about avoiding configuration where not absolutely required.

        • Ulrich@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I joke. Apple has gotten a lot better about giving options in recent years.

    • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      They should have just called it appleOS 26 since they are bumping all of it to 26 and unifying the look and feel between all of their OSs.

      • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        And the explanation for 26 is that it’s the version for 2026. Seems like a good choice when settling on a common number for all the operating systems. Similar to MY26 in cars etc.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Date-based versioning sounds great in theory, but if you have more than one version in support at once then it can get ugly quickly

            • smeg@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Say you released version 2023, 2024, and 2025, all of which are in support at the same time. It’s 2025, but your latest release might be 2023.2, which looks like it’s out of date to a user.

              • unique_hemp
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Apple bumps the version number for everything every year nowadays, so not a problem for them.

                • smeg@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  What do they do about devices that are still getting minor updates or fixes but not new major versions?