Do not really understand how Android sandboxing works for system apps.

    • FarLine99@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks. Wouldn’t be able to check it myself, because of using microG :D

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Good” really depends on what you’re after. Do not use CalyxOS if you care about security. They are significantly behind in implementing security patches, regularly. You are in some way more vulnerable with CalyxOS than regular android on a pixel because you would get security updates faster on pixel. Additionally, the network permission of GrapheneOS is a paramount security and privacy feature. Also, GrapheneOS takes over all location services requests even if you use google services, making sure that even if google services are installed, google only gets location info whenever the location request is for the google services, not all/any services or apps on your phone. There are additional points too, but CalyxOS, while I don’t want to bash them, should not be considered a secure OS the same way GraphemeOS is.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        The problem with Graphene os is that it is unethical. I want my device to be fully free or as free as it possibly can be. Graphene doesn’t see to care about that.

        Calyx is a bit better because it is a little stricter on software. Probably the best solution is to only install a apps you need and only get them from F-droid.

        • shabi@lemmy.fenbushi.site
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How is GrapheneOS unethical? How isn’t it as free as CalyxOS? Basically everything they add to the OS can be disabled. Personally, I’d say GrapheneOS and CalyxOS are the same in this regard.

          How is CalyxOS stricter on software? With GrapheneOS, a user can opt to only use F-Droid to install everything too if they wanted to.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Divest os is much more free in terms of software freedom. They minimize binary blobs and keep everything clean. They also maintain mull browser.

            • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The only problem I have with it is one I have with Custom ROMs in general:

              The Camera API to make use of all the lenses modern phones have. There is one single app that can somewhat hook into it for me to use my second lens, and it’s extremely unstable to the point of being functionally useless.

    • JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Everyone talks about custom ROMs, it’s so fucking annoying not a single one is supported on my Motorola g73. Next phone I’m getting is a fairphone, and I’ll dual boot a custom Android ROM and postmarket OS.

    • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I recommend checking this table out.

      CalyxOS misses the mark imo. It does a couple things well (such as its improved Dialer app, and the ability for hotspots/tethered devices to be able to use the phone’s VPN/Tor) that I hope to see other projects adopt, but beyond that, it just doesn’t seem to stack up.

      I’m not trying to bash them or anything because at the end of the day, they clearly have good intentions which I can respect, but I do hope they improve on a lot of things, because in its current state, CalyxOS just doesn’t even compare to GrapheneOS or DivestOS.

      • nosnahc@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only thing which stop me to install Graphene is that I need some apps that I’m not sure will work with this os

        • Skimmer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          GrapheneOS has pretty much perfect app compatibility. I don’t think I’ve ever ran into an issue in around a year of using it as my daily driver.

          Most apps function without Play Services, but you may lose some functionality like notifications, and a couple apps do very rarely genuinely break. But, that’s where Sandboxed Play Services comes in, which you can even put in an entirely separate user profile if you want to, so that you can still safely use those apps.

          But yeah, I’ve personally had no issues with app compatibility. Even my bank app works perfectly on Graphene (didn’t even require Play Services either!).

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    In order to have google apps and google services on an android installation that doesn’t have them yet, you need to sideload them. LineageOS has a list of GApps zips and here’s an example of how to install them for a FairPhone running LineageOS.

    If you look into the zip /system/system_ext/etc/permissions/privapp-permissions-google-system-ext.xml, you can see all the permissions given to it a system application.

    android.permission.RECOVERY, android.permission.MANAGE_USERS, android.permission.INTERACT_ACROSS_USERS stand out the most. These permissions allow the phone to be started, arbitrary apps to be installed and users to be created with new permissions.

    Google Services doesn’t need to have access to camera or any other component as it can install whatever it likes that has access to those.

    Let’s not kid ourselves, if you have Google Services installed, you have a rootkit installed with a bunch of proprietary code.

    Here’s the entire file for reference and you can look up each permission individually to see what access will be given.

    
    
    
        
            
            
            
            
        
    
        
            
            
            
        
    
        
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
    
        
            
        
    
        
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
            
        
    
    
    • FarLine99@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thanks for the detailed response. Creating/interacting between new users is a serious opportunity for permission bypass. Content of the file won’t load for some reason, but still :)

  • FarLine99@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am still not sure if sandbox is completely disabled for system applications. No comments with real arguments. But thank you, guys :)