• venji10@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think a blog named “iOSLife” belongs here. Apple is one of the worst offenders in terms of privacy violations.

  • macallik@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I think the article appears biased because searxng appears to offer the same functionality as Kagi, in spite of being free, yet Kagi is shown to be the best in class for some reason? Also it doesn’t touch on the critique that kagi having a login potentially aggregates all of your searches into one account that is stored by one company.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      Kagi’s privacy policy claims that “Searches are anonymous and private to you. Kagi does not log and associate searches with an account.”

      SearXNG is tricky because the privacy policy comes from whatever instance you are using.

      Anecdotally, I have had better results from Kagi than SearXNG. The SearXNG instance I have been testing out keeps getting rate limited and mostly shows results from Qwant and Bing.

      I don’t really have a bias as I am testing out all of these options and trying to find the one that works best for my family.

  • digger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I appreciate that you included sections of the relevant privacy policies. I like your approach.

    Please run what you write through spell check. You misspelled: extremely, business, advertisers, educated, and default. The word October could be capitalized, but as part of a hypothetical search query, it could be lower case on purpose.

    Lastly, Qwant is struck through in your last sentence. It’s unclear if you chose that formatting because you don’t recommend it (as stated earlier) or for some other reason.

    Keep writing! We need more of this!

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh yikes. Those are egregious spelling errors hahaha. Thank you for reading and the feedback!

      Yes, I struckthrough Qwant since they are sending your IP to Microsoft with every search. :)

  • kraniax@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is clearly biased. Your points against SearXNG are weak. And you purposefully ignore the huge privacy implications of needing an account to do searches.

    I don’t think this is written by a bot, but I’d say it’s either a camouflaged ad or a rather biased article.

    Edit: To be clear. I do not care that a certain company has a good privacy policy. I want verifiable facts, not unverifiable claims. Their backend is proprietary, while SearXNG is free software. There’s only one entity behind that company, which could be (or turn) malicious at any moment. Meanwhile, SearXNG is hosted by multiple individuals and organizations, you could even use a different instance each time, so it’s impossible to corelate your search queries.

    So yeah, this is a rather biased article towards a certain company.

    • ioslife@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for your feedback. My goal was just to look through the privacy policies with this, but you bring up a good point that that might not be a good experiment and could less to false assumptions. I do wonder if Kagi has had any this party analysis to back up their claims since it is not OSS.