In a two-month span, only 14% of Fox News’ segments about immigration enforcement mentioned noncriminal migrants being detained

  • taco@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    It’s not suggesting the opposite, it’s just using a different definition of criminal.

    When you say “criminal,” you’re referring to someone who has committed and/or been convicted of committing a crime. When Fox News uses the word, they mean people with skin that’s more than 1.5 shades darker than Hulk Hogan’s.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      They pull the typical “ackschualllly” thing too and say “they’re all criminals, they came here illegally!

      • taco@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think they’ve picked up enough legal residents to not take that at face value at this point. I have to presume they’re all here legally until proven otherwise in court.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Kinda depends. Having crossed the border without authorization? Criminal offense. BUT, it seems when one is caught in the act, that’s only a civil offense. Overstaying your visa and the like? Civil offense.

        Legal stuff from the ACLU. Take that with a grain of salt, seem like old data.