This is something I’ve wondered about but never really seen an official leftist position on, and it’s gotten a lot more relevant with the ongoing Palestinian uprising. Also curious if there is any good reading out there on this subject.

  • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    the point being the state didn’t have to deport them, not that there was no real impetus pushing them to leave. Loss of privileged status, and being reviled, or even chased out by the locals both can play a role, but it isn’t really a problem that you have to mobilize state power to fix.

    • zifnab25 [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      state didn’t have to deport them

      Not everything has to be a state policy.

      it isn’t really a problem that you have to mobilize state power to fix.

      At some level, reconciliation is a function of the state. People need healthy productive outlets for their enthusiasm after a colonial government fails. Otherwise, it all descends into tug of war over increasingly scarce resources.

      China handled this well, in the wake of the civil war. Cuba did, too. Haiti didn’t. France didn’t. And here we are.

      • YearOfTheCommieDesktop [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I agree, state policy probably needs to assist reconciliation. But they don’t need to decide the ultimate fate/living arrangements of settlers, and they don’t need to attempt to deport them all.