• LillyPip@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m still amused he kicked this whole thing off. He was clearly in a k-hole at the time and thought he was invincible.

    I mean, he likely is invincible, but watching them self-cannibalise is still the most entertainment we can expect from this.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Obviously.

      But if you’re in the black book of the world’s most notorious paedophile, maybe you should expect some level of investigation.

      Guess how many people are in there who haven’t made a massive thing about it?

      If you’re innocent, you’d probably shut the fuck up rather than making like all of the noise? These are people who can afford the best lawyers, who are certainly telling them to shut the fuck up.

      If you’re not either the world’s biggest moron or very guilty (such that it can’t get worse), you’d do that.

      This is not hard.

      • ColeSloth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Sort of in his black book?

        A note to find out if Musk wants to show up, but nothing further being listed is pretty much non news to me. I’m more interested in people who went to the island and his pedo parties.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          that would be cool to investigate every case

          Wait, what?

          How many people are in there?

          What is the FBI for? I’m reading you wrong, surely. I’m sorry if I am, because it sounds like you’re suggesting we shouldn’t bother with this if there are too many perpetrators.

          I’m pretty sure you’re not saying that, and I’m missing sarcasm.

          e: pretty sure I am. Sorry, I’m a dipshit sometimes, and I’ve been kinda high off and on.

            • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              Yeah,my point was that you seemed to imply if you’re already a publicly scrutinised person and you’re in those files, you should expect to avoid scrutiny.

              That’s not going to happen. If you’re innocent of crimes with children, you’ll be far overshadowed by those who we will see unequivocal evidence for (and that will be leaked soon, you can be sure), so you can mostly breathe fine.

              You’d be best off not defending them. It sort of sounds like you’re defending them. I apologise if I’m reading you wrong, but I want all those responsible to pay, and I’m fine with investigating collateral friendships to get there.

                • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I never said that at all. Obviously loads of innocent names will be attached to this, and I think most of us know that. We’re not that dumb.

  • BeBopALouie@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I assume he doesn’t even know what guilt is. More like he wants to take everyone else on the list down with him.

    Edit typo