• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok, you already pointed out that I’m supposedly lying, so why are you continuing? Do you need to point out that I am telling so-called lies over and over again?

    • atetulo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      so why are you continuing?

      I was responding to this:

      so I’m not sure why you’re still arguing about it.

      How about you stop asking me questions or pretending to be confused so I don’t have any further explanations to give?

      Are you going to reply to this and be like “why are you still continuing”? Lol.

        • atetulo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Here’s the major difference: we’re not just talking about tent cities. You specifically said those were people with full-time jobs that couldn’t afford living quarters.

          Can you prove that the tent cities outside of major cities are primarily occupied by full-time workers?

          There you go moving goalposts and trying to distort reality. This is why I don’t trust you.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Primarily occupied? No. Because I never made that claim. Feel free to quote me. Since, you know, I’m the liar here.

            • atetulo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Then there is no discussion. My argument ever since your reply has been that the phenomenon that you pointed out can only happen in major cities: people working full-time but can’t afford living quarters.

              Yeah, of course a homeless person without a job needs more money. I’m not referring to them because there’s honestly no point to. You knew I wasn’t referring to them, which is why you had to specify some of the people there were working full-time jobs.

              I’m referring to the people working jobs who feel they should get paid more while people around the world work harder for less. Those are the ones I do not take seriously.

              You, the liar that you are, posted a picture of people living in tents then said some of them have full-time jobs? How much is some? And to those some, I am specifically referring that their money would go further outside of major cities.

              Anyways. This entire argument is in bad faith. I can tell you’re the kind of person who thinks more money is the solution to all working class problems. It isn’t.

              Gonna block you now.