• Blaze
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ha ha ha ha.

    However, I guess in that position I would still be more cautious with wording. No need to burn bridges to make a point.

    • Szymon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Depending on the work and the contract, it may be the company burning a bridge. Specialized labour can be both difficult and expensive to find.

      • shifty51@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        47
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of contractors (good ones) know how to play the game. You can get away with a lot when the companies vertically integrated sales app that only they can fix goes belly up. Saw this before where an easily replaceable manager goes up against a long time contractor (ya know, with a contract) and leadership gets to decide how to resolve the situation…

        • AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’ve been in similar situations. It boils down to “You hired contractors to do this work because you don’t have the skills internally.” I cancelled a customer’s quarterly release because they didn’t hand over their requirements doc by the due date (after 2 months of prodding). The customer got really nasty with me. Got a call from my own VP after a few hours. He started to chew me out for not “working with them”. I showed him the dozens of emails and several meetings I had with them being clear about their responsibilities and timelines. He just said “Oh… I’ll talk to them.” The call with the customer’s PM the next day was hilarious. After he had chewed me out in front of 100+ of his people, he had to fall on his sword and take responsibility for messing up their release since it was his responsibility to manage their requirements and get them to me.

          I know nobody cares, but it feels good to get that story out!

    • StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea this is just silly and shortsighted. Reputation is everything, and once word gets around that you’re a pretentious dick who doesn’t need to attend meetings because you can’t get out of bed, you’ll be hard-pressed to find the next contract.

      • Droechai@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I work contract the meetings need to be in the contract. No way Im driving to location for a half hour meeting and then driving home.Either put it in contract or reimburse time, gas and wear otherwise I’m not attending

      • Triple_B@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Depends. I do contract work, and I’m replaceable. I’m nice anyways, but I’m even nicer given my status. However, there are some people that are essentially irreplaceable, and they make more in a week than I make in a month. They’re all assholes, but the powers that be capitulate to their every whim. I’d love to get qualified for what they do and replace them, regardless of the pay benefits. How can you make over a hundred an hour and be such a petulant, whiney baby? If I was making that money, man, I’d be literally the nicest person. Like, who gives a shit? You make wheelbarrows full of cash, so… who cares about minor inconveniences? And I’m not talking about work issues, I mean they whine about the same damn contract paperwork everyone has to fill out. It takes 10 minutes. I’m not doing it for you, no one will, so just… do it? Baffling.

        • shifty51@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          People get paid lots of money because they get results that generate even more money. Those people are given that money based on a track record of success. That success comes from making demands, and being cut throat. There is a very slim chance you can be nice and successful. It sucks, but that’s why they are assholes, because that’s who survives in those environments. Look at c level execs or really driven managers and it’s all the same “success at any cost” mantra. Also 10 minutes of paperwork at $14 an hour is $2.50 to the company while that same 10 minutes to this “top earners” is $20, or over an hour of a minimum wagers time. That’s why I am against huddles in the first place, they are money pits.