• OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Yeah, but that last guy isn’t going to sell you that Trump2024 bumpersticker.

    • Captain Poofter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Iunno, my sister is pagan and she seems to have been co opted into awful far right beliefs simply by appealing to her child (the trans people wanna cheat in sports in school! They’re grooming kids! Etc) and she collects pine cones and moon water.

      Pretty upset about it, tbh. But what can you do?

  • whatsarefoogee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems very odd that this post is calling a Muslim who doesn’t want to handle ham a small minded bigoted asshole. Isn’t forcing a Muslim to handle ham widely considered intolerant by the left leaning people? Help me out here.

    • GrandmasterFrank@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Muslim people aren’t forbidden from handling ham, in this scenario the Muslim person is refusing to sell you ham because they disagree with your decision to eat ham.

    • DevCat@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I recall correctly, coming into contact with pork products is against their rules. If it’s properly packaged, there’s no way they are coming into contact.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially since employees are supposed to wear gloves at all times for hygiene reasons. If they’re following regulations, there’s basically no risk of skin to skin contact with any pork products 🤷

  • PortableHotpocket@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    72
    ·
    1 year ago

    No, he just won’t sell anything to you unless you’re LGBT yourself or an extremely vocal ally. Then he’ll go destroy the other tills, because you’re not allowed to exist unless you are a part of his movement.

    • Doomsider@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ahh yes because violence is the hallmark of their movement. There has never been a doubt which side is violent and playing mind games is not going to change it.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They added “actually I’m bisexual” after the downvotes for their ridiculous bigotry started pouring in 😂

      Major Dean Browning energy on this one…

    • bcde74e3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Isn’t it weird that you can call Catholics, Muslims, Mormons, and Jehovah’s Witnesses small-minded, bigoted assholes, and get lots of upvotes? But when someone makes an equally stupid example about LGBT people, they are downvoted into oblivion and called a bigot and a hater.

      • Adlach@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        I haven’t seen any LGBT anti-religious marches. Do you know what I’ve seen a lot of?

        • bcde74e3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          The point I was trying to make is that it’s weird how people are okay with making jokes about people they don’t agree with. But if someone makes a equally bad characterization of a group they do agree with, they immediately start calling names.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            And the point you’re ignoring is that the OP isn’t making bigoted jokes about religious people, they’re making jokes about the bigotry of some religious people.

            The difference between that and demonizing people for existing while LGBTQ+ is so vast that your argument is almost exclusively made in bad faith by people who just want to discriminate without being called out for it.

            • bcde74e3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              You’re trying to see a difference where there is none, to justify the unequal treatment. They are both making bad generalizations about a hypothetical cashier that belongs to a certain group.

              No-one is demonizing people for who they are. Making a joke about a movement is not the same as being hateful to the people it represents. Just like you don’t seem to consider jokes about Catholics being hateful to them.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Clearly, the difference between punching up (making fun of bigotry and arbitrary rules imposed by the powerful) and punching down (making jokes where the punchline is denying someone’s identity or perpetuating hurtful stereotypes and conspiracy theories about already persecuted minority groups) is completely lost on you and you prefer that everyone else think that way.

                I’m just going to have to agree to disagree and ask you to argue in the defence of bigotry to someone else. Have the day you deserve.

                • bcde74e3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  At least now you’re being honest about the unequal treatment, by arbitrarily calling one minority ‘powerful’, and the other ‘persecuted’, one stereotype ‘fun’, and the other ‘hurtful’, one joke about ‘rules’, and the other about ‘identity’.

                  Again, you’re missing the point that this joke was about the movement, not the people it represents and who they are. Turning it into hate to those people is almost exclusively done in bad faith by people who want to discriminate one group, while protecting the other.

                  Have a good one.