Striker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoWhen a stranger ties their dog to your bike.lemmy.worldimagemessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1704arrow-down136
arrow-up1668arrow-down1imageWhen a stranger ties their dog to your bike.lemmy.worldStriker@lemmy.worldM to Mildly Infuriating@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square107fedilink
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down38·11 months agoI used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course. I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·11 months agoPlease tell me you’re being ironic. please
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down23·11 months agoI didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?
minus-squareMaggiWuerze@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoYou don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive? You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·11 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareSwednecklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down12·11 months agoyou are a disgusting person
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down13·11 months agoWhy? Because I know which dog might get stolen? Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoWithout the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.
minus-squaredeegeese@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down9·11 months agoNobody was going to steal a grumpy arthritic mutt. He was a good dog, but not much “curb appeal”.
minus-squareCryophilia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down11·11 months agoMaybe if you’re a dumbass
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoI assume this is a joke. This is comical villain levels of evil.
minus-squareCalavera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoI see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people
I used to tie my ugly mutt up in front of the corner market while I grab a few things. Never to someone’s bike of course.
I do not take such a risk with my expensive purebred.
Please tell me you’re being ironic.
please
I didn’t own both dogs at the same time, but 100% serious. What’s the problem?
You don’t see an issue in handling a dog poorly, because, as you put it, it’s an “ugly mutt” and then go ahead and tell us how much better you treat an animal because it was more expensive?
You really shouldn’t be allowed to own a dog or any animal.
Removed by mod
you are a disgusting person
Why? Because I know which dog might get stolen?
Should I have denied the mutt walks because of what people might think? Or should I endanger the purebred out of some strange sense of fairness?
Without the additional context it easily sounds like you don’t give a shit what happens to some mutt.
Nobody was going to steal a grumpy arthritic mutt.
He was a good dog, but not much “curb appeal”.
Maybe if you’re a dumbass
I assume this is a joke. This is comical villain levels of evil.
I see this all the time, don’t think it’s such a big deal also, sometimes I don’t understand social network people